Fast Tracking Dystopia

Via FOX News –

Congressional Republicans are trying to thwart a new federal housing rule they claim would allow Washington to play a heavy-handed role in trying to remake upscale neighborhoods as racially and economically diverse “utopias.”

The forthcoming regulations, expected to be formally proposed later this month, would leverage grant money to try and bring more affordable options into these neighborhoods. It would require local jurisdictions to report on their progress; they’d risk federal housing money if they don’t.

But while the Department of Housing and Urban Development program essentially aims for more integration and equality, critics see a meddling federal government.

“[The rule] tells us how we can live, where we go to school, how we will vote, what this utopian type of neighborhood should look like,” charged Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., who sponsored an amendment to the House HUD spending bill Wednesday, blocking any future funding for the new rule. The spending bill was passed in the House with the amendment.

“These rules want to manipulate the way American neighborhoods look,” he told FoxNews.com in an interview.

HUD officials and proponents of the new rule say it would do nothing but clarify — even simplify — current obligations under The Fair Housing Act of 1968.

More on this…

  • How Obama plans to diversify wealthy neighborhoods

Right now, local and state housing authorities must have plans showing they are “affirmatively furthering fair housing.” In other words, making sure their communities offer affordable housing opportunities in all neighborhoods, not just the poor ones, and do not discriminate based on color, religion, sex, or national origin. Affordable housing is generally defined as housing that costs no more than a third of a family’s monthly income.

The new rule would require jurisdictions to file a full assessment every five years that not only addresses the affordable housing landscape, but patterns in poverty and minority concentrations, as well as “community access” to transportation, good schools and jobs.

In addition to the assessments, the new requirements include an action plan obligating the jurisdiction to “identify the primary determinants influencing fair housing conditions, prioritize addressing these conditions, and set one or more goals for mitigating or addressing their determinants.” For its part, HUD would be sharing demographic data that local officials need to pull this together, while offering guidance and technical assistance.

But here’s the rub. If cities and counties don’t comply, it could put millions of dollars in annual federal block grants at risk, which critics say is how Washington can bully governments to do their bidding.

“This is nothing new,” countered Debby Goldberg, vice president at the National Fair Housing Alliance, who supports the rule. “It’s a planning tool. They leave it up to the jurisdictions to make their own decisions. HUD is not dictating what the answers must be, that’s up to the locality.”

HUD Secretary Julian Castro argued this in a hearing of the House Financial Services Committee June 11, when Rep. Mia Love, R-Utah, asked him directly if HUD would be actively telling localities how to remake their maps. “I know as a [former] mayor you wouldn’t want the federal government to come in and tell you what to do with your zoning and your rules,” she charged.

Castro said: “This is not about changing zoning laws, planning laws or anything like that.” He called the new requirements a “tool” for local communities to do what they already are obligated to do better.

“I wish I had this tool when I was mayor,” said Castro, who was mayor of San Antonio, Texas before he was appointed secretary of HUD in 2014. “We want to ensure that local communities have the tools to assess the landscape of housing in their area, where the investments are, where the affordable housing opportunities are,” he said.

But Gosar is concerned that the feds would force local officials to plot out significant changes to their communities, as a requirement for grant money.

In order to get the money, he said, “you have to give them the plan and ask for a sign-off. These rules are put into place to manipulate the way America looks.”

Critics point to the case of Westchester County, N.Y., which has been locked in a battle with HUD since it settled in a lawsuit brought by the nonprofit Anti-Discrimination Center over the county’s lack of affordable housing units. The 2009 settlement, which HUD helped broker with the Justice Department, mandated the affluent county spend $50 million of its own money to build units, most of which would be in predominantly white neighborhoods. The county and HUD have been arguing ever since over compliance, with Westchester claiming HUD has been changing the rules along the way. As a result, HUD has repeatedly withheld annual funding from the county.

But Goldberg said this is the way it works — jurisdictions aren’t forced to comply with the law, but they won’t get federal grants if they don’t. “The law says if you are getting funds you have to show that you are affirmatively furthering fair housing,” she said, noting it was designed that way to better the quality of life for all Americans, not just the ones who can afford to live in affluent neighborhoods. Segregation by race and poverty traps families in dead-end, often unhealthy circumstances, Goldberg added.

“We know that the more inclusive the neighborhoods are, the more robust your economy, the better the schools are, the jobs.”

This should be directed at the local level, not from Washington, Gosar said. He has introduced a stand-alone bill that would block the rule from reaching fruition. For now, it is up to the Senate if it wants to carve it out of their own HUD spending bill.

“Once again,” he said, “it’s an overreach on our liberties to live and work and move to wherever we want.”


Just think about what takes place while you are worrying about paying your mortgage or if your sons and daughters will be sent to fight a no-win war. . . the liberals are busy at work leveling the playing field.  There is a lot more to this story than appears on the surface.   It is only a small piece of the total effort to eliminate the middle class.  Stir your memories and look for commonality:

  • Common core dumbed- down education mandate
  • Pope and other religious leaders pushing for ecumenism
  • Climate change treated as a mandate
  • Sweden and Denmark move to eliminate cash
  • Terms like multi-lateralism and sustainability have become formulaic catch phrases to massage sheeple into the one world system
  • Biblical standards marginalized and excoriated
  • Merging of services, government agencies,  and blurring of boundaries

There is no profit in belaboring this idea.  Those who wish to be aware, are already aware.  Those who are content to sit and passively accept the take over, are welcome to it.  The blame for this, lies squarely in the pulpits of churches whose shepherds have herded their flocks straight into the New World Order.  I have heard with my own ears, more than one pastor who proudly proclaims he will not preach on prophecy – because it is too controversial.  Well, that is dropping the ball in a big way, especially since the Bible itself, is at a bare minimum – 40% prophecy.  That means in conservative terms, you are missing almost half of the Bible.  Is that OK with you?  If Rick Warren is America’s pastor – we are in serious trouble – right now. 

old bible

The Vine Vigil urges everyone to get out of their Cotton Candy churches, and find a fundamental, King James only church.  Do you truly want to be sitting in a luke-warm, Laodicean church when the Lord calls us home?  How will you answer the Lord about why you stayed in that worldly church?  Your pastor should be speaking out about things going on in the world.  If he isn’t – he is a weak coward and not following the pattern for shepherding which is Divinely recorded for us in the New Testament.  I found my church by making phone calls, and visiting.  It is definitely not the church that is closest for  me to drive to, but it is by far the church that is closet to my Bible. 

Evil Art

evil art

evolution of man

sjogrenhourglass

Excerpt from article. . .

1 Peter 5:8

Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour. . .

How the Sodomites Won


Thursday • June 3, 2004


The spectacular success of the homosexual movement stands as one of the most fascinating phenomena of our time. In less than two decades, homosexuality has moved from “the love that dares not speak its name,” to the center of America’s public life. The homosexual agenda has advanced even more quickly than its most ardent proponents had expected, and social change of this magnitude demands some explanation.

A partial explanation of the homosexual movement’s success can be traced to the 1989 publication of After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90s. Published with little fanfare, this book became the authoritative public relations manual for the homosexual agenda, and its authors presented the book as a distillation of public relations advice for the homosexual community. A look back at its pages is an occasion for understanding just how successful their plan was.

Authors Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen combined psychiatric and public relations expertise in devising their strategy. Kirk, a researcher in neuropsychiatry, and Madsen, a public relations consultant, argued that homosexuals must change their presentation to the heterosexual community if real success was to be made.

Conceiving their book as a “gay manifesto for the 1990s,” the authors called for homosexuals to repackage themselves as mainstream citizens demanding equal treatment, rather than as a promiscuous sexual minority seeking greater opportunity and influence.

Writing just as the AIDS crisis hit its greatest momentum, the authors saw the disease as an opportunity to change the public mind. “As cynical as it may seem, AIDS gives us a chance, however brief, to establish ourselves as a victimized minority legitimately deserving of America’s special protection and care,” they wrote.

Give them credit: they really did understand the operation of the public mind. Kirk and Madsen called for homosexuals to talk incessantly about homosexuality in public. “Open, frank talk makes gayness seem less furtive, alien, and sinful; more above board,” they asserted. “Constant talk builds the impression that public opinion is at least divided on the subject, and that a sizeable bloc–the most modern, up-to-date citizens–accept or even practice homosexuality.”

Nevertheless, not all talk about homosexuality is helpful. “And when we say talk about homosexuality, we mean just that. In the early stages of the campaign, the public should not be shocked and repelled by premature exposure to homosexual behavior itself. Instead, the imagery of sex per se should be downplayed, and the issue of gay rights reduced, as far as possible, to an abstract social question.”

Portraying homosexuals as victims was essential to their strategy. Offering several principles for tactical advance in their cause, the authors called upon homosexuals to “portray gays as victims of circumstance and depression, not as aggressive challengers.” This would be necessary, they argued, because “gays must be portrayed as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to adopt the role of protector.”

Such a strategy could, they asserted, lead to something like a “conversion” of the public mind on the question of homosexuality. “The purpose of victim imagery is to make straights feel very uncomfortable; that is, to jam with shame the self-righteous pride that would ordinarily accompany and reward their antigay belligerence, and to lay groundwork for the process of conversion by helping straights identify with gays and sympathize with their underdog status.”

Obviously, this would mean marginalizing some members of the homosexual community. Kirk and Madsen were bold to advise a mainstreaming of the homosexual image. “In practical terms, this means that cocky mustachioed leather-men, drag queens, and bull dykes would not appear in gay commercials and other public presentations. Conventional young people, middle-age women, and older folks of all races would be featured, not to mention the parents and straight friends of gays.” Furthermore, “It cannot go without saying, incidentally, that groups on the farthest margins of acceptability, such as NAMBLA [North American Man-Boy Love Association], must play no part at all in such a campaign. Suspected child molesters will never look like victims.”

What about the origin of sexual orientation? The success of the homosexual movement can be largely traced to the very idea of “orientation” itself. More precisely, homosexuals advanced their cause by arguing that they were born that way. Madsen and Kirk offer this as candid public relations advice. “We argue that, for all practical purposes, gays should be considered to have been born gay–even though sexual orientation, for most humans, seems to be the product of a complex interaction between innate predispositions and environmental factors during childhood and early adolescence.” Alas, “To suggest in public that homosexuality might be chosen is to open the can of worms labeled ‘moral choices and sin’ and give the religious intransigents a stick to beat us with. Straights must be taught that it is as natural for some persons to be homosexual as it is for others to be heterosexual: wickedness and seduction have nothing to do with it.”

There can be no doubt that Christianity represents the greatest obstacle to the normalization of homosexual behavior. It cannot be otherwise, because of the clear biblical teachings concerning the inherent sinfulness of homosexuality in all forms, and the normativity of heterosexual marriage. In order to counter this obstacle, Kirk and Madsen advised gays to “use talk to muddy the moral waters, that is, to undercut the rationalizations that ‘justify’ religious bigotry and to jam some of its psychic rewards.” How can this be done? “This entails publicizing support by moderate churches and raising serious theological objections to conservative biblical teachings. It also means exposing the inconsistency and hatred underlying antigay doctrines.”

Conservative churches, defined by the authors as “homohating” are portrayed as “antiquated backwaters, badly out of step with the times and with the latest findings of psychology.”

A quick review of the last 15 years demonstrates the incredible effectiveness of this public relations advice. The agenda set out by Kirk and Madsen led to nothing less than social transformation. By portraying themselves as mainstream Americans seeking nothing but liberty and self-fulfillment, homosexuals redefined the moral equation. Issues of right and wrong were isolated as outdated, repressive, and culturally embarrassing. Instead, the assertion of “rights” became the hallmark of the public relations strategy.

Other principles offered by the authors included making gays look good by identifying strategic historical figures as being hidden homosexuals, and, on the other hand, making “victimizers” look bad in the public eye. Kirk and Madsen suggested isolating conservative Christians by presenting them as “hysterical backwoods preachers, drooling with hate to a degree that looks both comical and deranged.” They offered a concrete example of how this strategy could be used on television and in print. “For example, for several seconds an unctuous beady-eyed Southern preacher is shown pounding the pulpit in rage against ‘those perverted, abominable creatures.’” While his tirade continues over the soundtrack, the picture switches to heart-rending photos of badly beaten persons, or of gays who look decent, harmless, and likeable; and then we cut back to the poisonous face of the preacher. The contrast speaks for itself. The effect is devastating.”

Public relations is now a major part of the American economy, with hundreds of millions of dollars poured into advertising strategies and image enhancement programs. Observers of the public relations world must look back with slack-jawed amazement at the phenomenal success of the approach undertaken by homosexuals over the last two decades. The advice offered by Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen is nothing less than a manifesto for moral revolution. A look back at this strategy indicates just how self-consciously the homosexual movement advanced its cause by following this plan.

Those who oppose the normalization of homosexuality have indeed been presented as backwoods, antiquated, and dangerous people, while those advancing the cause are presented as forces for light, progress, and acceptance. Conservative Christians have indeed been presented as proponents of hatred rather than as individuals driven by biblical conviction. The unprecedented success of this public relations strategy helps to explain why America has accepted everything from homosexual characters and plotlines in prime-time entertainment to the lack of outrage in response to same-sex marriage in Massachusetts.

At least we know what we are up against. Biblical Christians must continue to talk about right and wrong even when the larger world dismisses morality as an outdated concept. We must maintain marriage as a non-negotiable norm–a union of a man and a woman–even when the courts redefine marriage by fiat. At the same time, we must take into account the transformation of the American mind that is now so devastatingly evident to all who have eyes to see.

The real tragedy of After the Ball is that the great result of this is not a party, but the complete rejection of the very moral foundations which made this society possible. In order to address the most fundamental problems, we must understand the shape of the American mind. Looking back at After the Ball after fifteen years, it all comes into frightening focus.

Dr. Mohler portrait speaking Dr. R. Albert Mohler Jr. serves as president of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary – the flagship school of the Southern Baptist Convention and one of the largest seminaries in the world.


The  Hegelian dialectic  is the framework for guiding  our thoughts and actions into conflicts that lead us to a predetermined solution. If we do not understand  how the Hegelian dialectic shapes our perceptions of the  world, then we do not know how we are helping  to implement the vision.  When we remain locked into dialectical thinking, we cannot  see out of the  box.


2 Corinthians 11:3


But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.


(NaturalNews) The more subtle side of satanism in Hollywood entertainment is now a thing of the past, as primetime television airs blatantly evil shows like the upcoming Fox drama Lucifer, which glorifies the goings about of the “lord of hell” after he fictitiously leaves the lake of fire and retires to Los Angeles.

The premise behind the absurd drama, which is set to release in 2016, centers around so-called “Lucifer Morningstar” and his new life as the owner of Lux, an upscale nightclub located in the City of Angels.

A trailer for the show portrays Lucifer as a handsome, British-accented, well-to-do ladykiller full of charm and wit.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/049831_Lucifer_Fox_mainstream_media.html



13 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.

14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.

15 Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.

We truly are living in the last days.  Do you see where this all leads?  First the idea is introduced into popular culture for conditioning of the masses.  Does anyone recall the ridiculous “Uncle Arthur” on the 60’s Tv show – “Bewitched?”

He was the penultimate funny “gay guy.”  He wore a neck scarf and had homosexual affectations, yet he was appealing because he was so funny.  The TV consumer, lets down their guard and the Dialectic has done its job.  Now, we are faced with the worst perversions known to mankind being “normalized” into our society.  Decades of “funny gay guys” leads to not so funny sodomites parading their sin down the streets of our cities. 

I’m not laughing now – are you?  I hope you can see how the Dialectic progresses, and how we got to where we are now.



https://thevinevigil.com/gods-plan-of-salvation/

John Kerry Commits Public Blasphemy

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

redeemd

Isaiah 43:25

I, even I, am He that blotteth out thy transgressions for Mine own sake, and will not remember thy sins.

For the Lord’s Day – Under His Wings


If $100,000 was your whole life savings, would you give every penny of it to someone in need? William O. Cushing did something like that. In the nineteenth century, when $1,000 was a lot of money, he gave his entire life savings to pay for the education of a blind girl.

That is not what he is remembered for, however. His fame is as a hymnwriter. One of his earliest hymns was the song, “When He Cometh,” which compared Christians to jewels whom Christ would gather when he came. Other notable hymns were written after he had experienced great grief and loss. But that is getting ahead of the story.

William Orcutt Cushing was born in Hingham, Massachusetts on this date, December 31, 1823. His parents raised him as a Universalist, but by reading the Bible for himself as a teenager, he became an orthodox believer. At eighteen he was convinced the Lord wanted him to become a minister and he trained for it.

His first pastorate was at Searsburg, New York. There he met and married Rena Proper in 1854 (which was also the year he wrote “When He Cometh”). After that he served in Auburn, Brooklyn, Buffalo and Sparta, New York. With the decline of his wife’s health, William returned with her to Searsburg where she died in 1870.

After that, “creeping paralysis” stole his voice and prevented him from preaching any longer. He pleaded with the Lord to allow him to continue to serve in some capacity.

His prayer was granted. He wrote over 300 hymns. Some of these are still beloved by the church. “Follow on” was written in 1878 to a tune by Robert Lowry. “Follow, follow, I will follow Jesus; anywhere, everywhere…” it promises. “Under His Wings,” printed and sung by Ira Sankey, sprang out of Cushing’s personal suffering and was suggested by Psalm 17:8, “Hide me under the shadow of your wings.” Another of his famous hymns “Ring the Bells of Heaven” was written before his deep troubles had descended upon him. Composer George F. Root had sent him the tune. Cushing felt it needed joyful words and mused on it all day before the words came to him.

Cushing died in 1902 but his songs live on.

http://www.christianity.com/church/church-history/timeline/1801-1900/william-o-cushing-sought-to-follow-christ-11630395.html

Psalm 91:4

 He shall cover thee with His feathers, and under His wings shalt thou trust:

His truth shall be thy shield and buckler.

For the Lord’s Day – I’ll Go Where You Want Me To Go


Words: Ma­ry Brown, in Our Best En­dea­vor (Sil­ver Bur­dett & Com­pa­ny: 1892) (verse 1), and Charles E. Pri­or (vers­es 2-3). The orig­in­al ti­tle was “Go Stand and Speak,” with mu­­sic by Pri­­or.

This well-known miss­ion­ary and con­se­cra­tion hymn was adopt­ed by a class of over a hun­dred miss­ion­a­ry nurs­es at the Bat­tle Creek (Mi­chi­gan) San­i­tar­i­um as their class hymn. Eve­ry Sun­day af­ter­noon they would ga­ther for a so­cial meet­ing and al­ways sing [it]…In this class were stu­dents from near­ly ev­ery State of the Un­ion, from Aus­tral­ia, South Af­ri­ca, South Amer­i­ca, Bul­gar­ia, Ar­men­ia, and near­ly all the Eur­o­pe­an coun­tries. At the close of the course they agreed that after they had part­ed and gone to their dif­fer­ent fields, they would sing this hymn ev­ery Sun­day as they had done dur­ing their hap­py class-days.

Sankey, pp. 163-4

Music: Car­rie E. Roun­se­fell, 1894 (MI­DIscore). She wrote the tune for these words, for use in a re­viv­al meet­ing at the Bap­tist church in Lynn, Mass­a­chu­setts.      http://cyberhymnal.org/htm/i/g/igowhere.htm


Romans 12:10-11

10 Be kindly affectioned one to another with brotherly love; in honour preferring one another;

11 Not slothful in business; fervent in spirit; serving the Lord;

Friday Proverb – Sluggish Workers

Proverbs 10:26

 As vinegar to the teeth, and as smoke to the eyes,

So is the sluggard to them that send him.

Friday Proverb – Wisdom is Everlasting

proverbs
wisdom in the Word
rubies
sparrows

19 My fruit is better than gold, yea, than fine gold; and my revenue than choice silver.

Laodicean Church

Friday Proverb – The Wiles of a Harlot

proverbs
harlot
major loser

the eye

21 With her much fair speech she caused him to yield, with the flattering of her lips she forced him.

caught by a harlot

25 Let not thine heart decline to her ways, go not astray in her paths.

church, flag and bible

24 Hearken unto me now therefore, O ye children, and attend to the words of my mouth.

25 Let not thine heart decline to her ways, go not astray in her paths.

26 For she hath cast down many wounded: yea, many strong men have been slain by her.

27 Her house is the way to hell, going down to the chambers of death.

1 Thessalonians 5:23

And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Friday Proverb – More Warnings Against Adultery

proverbs

Proverbs 6:20-35

Instruction from godly parents is to be integral to the young Christian.  Holding tightly to such counsel, will be a boon to resisting the world, the flesh, and the devil!

major loser

Often people blame the man in instances of adultery.  Certainly – in cases where the female is underage, he is 100% responsible.  But – in the sin of two adults – both are responsible.  Women who pursue married men are considered whores in the Bible.  Not long ago in our culture – women who did such things were called home-wreckers.  Now they are glorified in the media,  and money is thrown at them for their evil doings.

the eye

The Proverb summarizes in the next six verse, by comparing adultery to stealing bread.  If one steals because he is starving, it is more easily forgiven.  If one steals when one has plenty – it is deserving of revenge.

rapture23

Isaiah 61:10

I will greatly rejoice in the Lord, my soul shall be joyful in my God; for He hath clothed me with the garments of salvation, He hath covered me with the robe of righteousness, as a bridegroom decketh himself with ornaments, and as a bride adorneth herself with her jewels.

Friday Proverb – Seven Deadly Sins

 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

a lying tongue

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

the wrong path

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Friday Proverb – Warning Against Falsehood

scheming

King James Version (KJV)

gossiping

Truly – this must be the greatest trouble in the Body of Christ.  It is tragic that so many false converts are within the fold – but it is a fact that must be faced.  How could anyone professing the Name of Christ be “devising mischief continually?”  The LORD sees everything – and those that do these things will not go unpunished.

calamity

King James Version (KJV)

But they mocked the messengers of God, and despised His words, and misused His prophets, until the wrath of the Lord arose against His people, till there was no remedy.

Hints for Home Schoolers – The Rest of the Day

swans

Her children arise up, and call her blessed; her husband also, and he praiseth her.

A Lamp in the Dark

Click “watch on youtube” to watch this documentary!

159 Consider how I love Thy precepts: quicken me, O Lord, according to Thy lovingkindness.

160 Thy word is true from the beginning: and every one of Thy righteous judgments endureth for ever.

Video – The Real Historical Patrick

Uploaded to youbtube by ChristianVoice Editor

Please visit Richard Bennet’s website here – http://bereanbeacon.org/en/

posted by sage

Video – Journey to the Edge of Creation: The Milky Way and Beyond


Uploaded to youtube by ages777

Psalm 33:6

 By the Word of the Lord were the heavens made; and all the host of them by the breath of His mouth.

Rock Music is Satanic

!!! strong caution – adult viewing only !!!


syncopation

In syncopation, the beat that is normally weak, is heavily stressed. It is also known as the “back-beat” in pop and rock music. It causes the left brain (emotional) to respond, and causes the heart to attempt to match the back-beat.

More on this later. . .

Christian Theater – Prior Claim

Isaiah 37:16

O Lord of hosts, God of Israel, that dwellest between the cherubims, Thou art the God, even Thou alone, of all the kingdoms of the earth: Thou hast made heaven and earth.

Christian Theater – The Hiding Place

Counting Down…..the Last Days…..

It’s hard to not see that we are living in very unique times. When has there ever been such globalization and convergence of disasters and societal, monetary and political maneuverings? This doesn’t take any of us who are students of and believers of God’s word. We have been watching for this time in history. Pastor […]

Counting Down…..the Last Days…..